2-40 Bristol Rd E Mississauga ON
Réussi
2 infractions relevées lors de la dernière inspection.
Source : Peel Public Health
2 avril 2026
Ce résumé est généré par IA et peut contenir des erreurs.
Le restaurant n'a pas maintenu des normes adéquates de propreté et d'organisation lors de l'inspection.
Le restaurant doit avoir au moins un employé possédant une certification valide en matière de sécurité alimentaire présent chaque fois que le restaurant est ouvert.
Columbus Bakery se trouve dans le quartier Hurontario NHD. Hurontario NHD, Mississauga compte 113 restaurants suivis sur Pass or Fail, inspectés par Peel Public Health. En date du 15 juillet 2026, 112 (99%) d'entre eux ont réussi leur dernière inspection, sans réussi conditionnel ni fermeture.
Ce dossier provient de Peel Public Health. Les inspecteurs notent toute infraction aux règlements sanitaires applicables à chaque visite. Le résultat ci-dessus correspond à la dernière inspection au dossier.
Un résultat « Réussi » signifie qu'aucune infraction significative n'a été relevée. Un « Réussi conditionnel » signifie qu'un problème a été constaté et que le restaurant a obtenu un délai pour le corriger. Un résultat « Fermé » signifie que l'inspecteur a ordonné l'arrêt du service à la clientèle.
Coco Fresh Tea & Juice
Hurontario NHD
Ce restaurant a été inspecté 7 fois depuis le 4 septembre 2024, avec 5 réussites, 2 résultats conditionnels et 1 fermeture au dossier.
2 infractions
Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
7 infractions
Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
Did operator take adequate measures to maintain food premises in a condition that prevent harbourage or breeding of pests? (Significant Risk)
Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
Did operator provide sufficient level of lighting?
Did operator maintain the mechanical ventilation system to remove odours, fumes, vapours, smoke and excessive heat?
3 infractions
Did operator provide a test reagent to determine the concentration of sanitizer?
Did operator properly wash and sanitize utensils?
Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
Aucune infraction
5 infractions
Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
Did operator store food to prevent contamination and/or adulteration? (Significant Risk)
Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
3 infractions
Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
3 infractions
Did operator keep potentially hazardous food out of the temperature danger zone, and provide adequately sized refrigeration and/or hot-holding equipment/space for the safe storage of such food? (Significant risk)
Did operator provide and use accurate and easy-to-read thermometers?
Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
Did operator use good housekeeping practices ?
Is at least one food handler/supervisor with valid food handler certification present on-site during every hour of operation?
Did operator maintain non-food contact surfaces clean, sanitary and in good condition?
Did operator provide sufficient level of lighting?